Should
there be a separate trash disposal fee?
By James Rada Jr.
News Editor
THURMONT,
Md. – About 40 percent of Thurmont residents’ property
taxes go to pay for trash disposal.
“Hundreds
of thousands of dollars on the municipal property tax pay
for solid waste disposal and it’s not fair that someone
who owns a $500,000 house will pay more for solid waste disposal
than someone in a $50,000 even if they generate the same amount
of trash,” said Thurmont Mayor Martin Burns.
In 2006, disposing
of trash in Thurmont cost residents $371,700 or 9 cents of
their 27-cent municipal tax rate.
Burns wants to
take the trash costs out of the tax rate and create an enterprise
fund for solid waste disposal like the sewer, water and electricity
funds. Waste disposal costs have risen over the years, putting
more pressure on the town council to raise the tax rate. However,
they then get blamed for the increase to a cost over which
they have little control.
“Everyone
wants transparency in government,” Burns said. “This
will do it.”
The town did
try to exert some control over the costs by instituting mandatory
recycling. By reducing the tonnage that went to the landfill,
the town saved on tipping fees. While recycling has had some
effect, the overall cost of waste disposal is still climbing.
Though the enterprise
fund would do nothing to reduce the overall cost, it would
more fairly balance the costs and also show residents why
that portion of their taxes goes up.
The fund would charge residents separately for their waste
disposal while reducing their municipal tax rate by the appropriate
amount.
“The only thing that will probably remain in the tax
rate is the tipping fees, but realistically, the fund would
be a revenue neutral move,” Burns said.
He said the enterprise
fund wouldn’t be established to make money but to show
residents the true cost of solid waste disposal.
The commissioners
will talk more about the idea as they begin to discuss the
fiscal year 2009 town budget.